OK I have to say it...I don't
get it.
My Vanity Fair magazine arrived
today complete with Caitlyn Jenner on the cover. And that got me to thinking...just what is a woman?
Are you a woman because you think
like a woman? More on that in a bit.
Because you look like a woman?
Or have a body like a woman?
Because you look like a woman?
Or have a body like a woman?
Thinking like woman?
Well, what is that?
Well, what is that?
An article by Elinor Burkett in
June 6 NY Times nails it. In responding
to the interview question about recognition of being transgender, Jenner had
responded “My brain is much more female than it is male.” Burkett asserts that “People
who haven’t lived their whole lives as women, whether Ms. Jenner or Mr.
Summers*, shouldn’t get to define us…” Jenner has not had a lifetime of being defined as a woman and
THEREFORE shaped by those presumptions. I commend the rest of the article for
you to read -- here.
Another recent story is also
informative. Earlier this month, Nobel
prize winning scientist Tim Hunt remarked at the World Conference of Science
Journalists explaining why he couldn’t work with women scientists. His reason?
He said, “Three
things happen when they are in the lab.... You fall in love with them, they
fall in love with you, and when you criticize them, they cry." What
an appalling view of women.
Thankfully
many women scientists displayed far more intelligence, sense and humor by their
responses. Perhaps that is thinking like
a woman.
It’s one of the oldest excuses
in the book—when men get into trouble—quick, blame a woman. Ahem, does the name Eve come to mind?
So, back to the subject of what
is a woman. It is understandable that the thinking displayed in the Tim Hunt
story, replicated many times over in thousands of other examples, unavoidably
shapes women. Girls who are pampered,
protected, diminished, demeaned can’t help but experience life differently—think
like a woman—than boys who have been encouraged to be assertive, be bold, be
strong. That does NOT, of course, mean
that girls can’t assert themselves and find their own identities. But it is much easier to do that when girls
are encouraged to be assertive, be bold, and be strong.
One more observation on the
Caitlyn Jenner transformation. As the Vanity Fair story reveals, Jenner had two
years of treatment to remove facial hair (I can think of many post-menopausal
women who would envy the chance to undergo such treatments). Further, she had 10 hours of surgery to help “feminize”
her face. She had body sculpting, including—obviously—breast augmentation. And,
lastly, that waist! As the cover photo
reveals, the body constructed is quite stunning. It is a body that many many women do NOT
have, and yet they are most decidedly women.
The irony is that in order to be a woman, Caitlyn Jenner opted for a
physical, visual approach—yet again defining how society too often defines women.
What I find so very sad is that these stereotypical ways of thinking about what it means to be a
woman—looking great, “thinking” like a woman—miss the mark and what I think is
the most important attribute of being a woman. When our
daughter was a little girl, like many little girls she would say she wanted to
be pretty. I used to tell her—I don’t want you to just be pretty, I want you to
be intelligent. And then I would add—pretty
can fade, but intelligence doesn’t.
That’s what I wish people meant
when they say—just like a woman.
----------------------------------------
* Lawrence Summers--former president of Harvard, among other accomplishments. He "famously" stated that there aren't many women in math and science because of "biological differences."
----------------------------------------
* Lawrence Summers--former president of Harvard, among other accomplishments. He "famously" stated that there aren't many women in math and science because of "biological differences."
3 comments:
Very interesting. I enjoyed Burkett's article. Strange that Jenner felt the need for all that sculpting. But given the family's total focus on beauty and superficial appearances enhanced by plastic surgery, I suppose Jenner's reaction fits the family model.
NC--Excellent point. I too found the sculpting to be one of the strangest details in this whole story. Jenner is 65...and many people--men and women--don't have the wherewithal or even the need to remake themselves so drastically.
I like your explanation--the influence of too much exposure to reality TV.
A helpful reflection on this particular situation. I have little doubt that the transgender experience is deep and complex; but Jenner's case feels to me too much like, "If you feel something, it must be true." That doesn't work even for the most feeling of the Myers-Briggs types. I would rather honour and support and learn from those whose transgender experience appears to me (feels?) less manipulative. None of this tells me that Jenner is playing games -- or that he/she is not playing games. Just that the media attention seems out of focus to me. I have good friends whose first grandchild is transitioning from male to female. I think that his/her journey does not belong in the national limelight; nor, I think, does Jenner's. And I wish my friends' grandchild all good in navigating a difficult journey. No answers; just a desire to travel together. (Without unnecessary adulation or scorn.)
Post a Comment