One of the most wrenching details for me was about the way
frantic parents had gathered awaiting news of their children. One by one, children and parents were
reunited, until—finally—there was only a handful of parents remaining. While there was a protocol that was to be followed,
apparently the governor of Connecticut thought that prolonging those parents’
agony was simply cruel, so he straightforwardly told them—if your child isn’t
with you, they aren’t coming home.
Some people have criticized the governor for being so
blunt. But, his approach was the right
one.
I don’t know if you have ever been in a situation where you
have to be the one to tell the bad news.
I have.
Many years ago, my father-in-law suffered a catastrophic
health event, a dissecting aortic aneurysm.
He was rushed to the local hospital, and family members were quickly
summoned. We all gathered in the
critical care unit awaiting news of his status as he underwent diagnostic
tests. During that time, the assembled
family decided that someone needed to travel to his home town and be with his
elderly mother. That lot fell to me.
When I reached the home, I tried to comfort Grandma as best
I could. My father-in-law was her eldest
child and very much a mainstay for her.
Suddenly, the phone rang. When I
answered, it was my husband calling to inform me that his father had not pulled
through, and had died even before he could be operated on. Something in my tone of voice tipped Grandma
off—and, even though “the plan” was to wait until the pastor arrived to tell
her, she demanded: Is he dead?
I had a choice—I could have postponed responding,
temporizing and delaying the news until the pastor arrived, or I could answer
her straightforwardly and honestly. I
chose the latter.
I replied simply: Yes, Grandma, he’s gone. Immediately she began wailing and rocking
back and forth. After a bit, as I held
her, she calmed down a bit. I read some
of the Psalms to her as she quieted. Of
course, my immediate telling in no way lessened her grief, but it gave her
immediate information instead of making her stay in a suspended state, fearing
and guessing the worst all the while hoping against hope it wasn’t true.
Of course, I don’t know if Governor Malloy was going through
a similar calculus, but his decision to tell immediately was a small kindness
in the midst of horrific grief.
5 comments:
I had not heard that. What a decision to be left to him. How hard that must have been.
I agree completely. I was struck by how painful that news must have been but also by how awful it would have been to deliver it. Still waiting longer would have been so unkind.
I was reading about the grandfather who lived near the school who ended up with a group of kids in his house who had fled. Hours after they'd been reunited with their families, a mother showed up at the door, hoping against hope that he had her child there. He didn't and when he looked at the names after they'd been released, her child's name was on the list.
The Governor's kind bluntness ended her frantic search and let her move to grief, I'm sure.
Everything about this is awful. Thank you for finding a glimmer of light in the news of that day.
Malloy was spot on ... as were you.
In my nursing career I had many occasions to assist in informing family members that a loved one had died. I have little doubt that the direct way is best...the simple truth sincerely and compassionately spoken.
I remember the funeral afterwards. "Rejoice, the Lord is King ...." Grief and joy flow mingled down.
Post a Comment